Aller au contenu
GenLovers

The State of AI Video Generation, 2026

Dernière mise à jour:

Écrit par Clement

This report pulls together two datasets we gathered ourselves rather than repeating industry press releases: real search-demand signals for the major AI video generation models, and real per-clip pricing transcribed directly from each vendor's published API rates.

Search-demand figures are Bing broad impressions (a relative, not absolute, demand proxy — see methodology below); pricing figures are cheapest-common-tier rates as of the dates noted per model. Both datasets are maintained as our content changes, not published once and abandoned.

Points clés

  • Kling (Kuaishou) is the single most-searched AI video model we track, at roughly 3.5x the search volume of Veo 3 and 2x Seedance.
  • Runway is the only model in our top tier with rising search demand; Sora's is declining over the same window.
  • Pricing spans an order of magnitude at the cheapest common tier: from about $0.19 per 5-second clip (Hailuo, fast tier) to $0.50 (Veo 3 fast tier, Seedance fast tier).
  • Vendors use three different billing models for the same underlying product — per-second (Kling, Veo 3, Seedance) and per-generation (Hailuo) — which makes cross-vendor comparison genuinely hard without normalizing to a common clip length, which is what this report does.

Search demand by model (Bing broad impressions)

Our own Bing Webmaster pulls, latest period, country=us. A relative demand proxy, not Google volume — see the methodology note below.

Kling (Kuaishou)3,526 impressions ("kling ai")
Seedance (ByteDance)1,759 impressions ("seedance")
Runway1,259 impressions ("runway ai"), rising
Sora (OpenAI)1,227 impressions ("sora ai video"), declining
Veo 3 (Google DeepMind)932 impressions ("veo 3")
Hailuo (MiniMax)503 impressions ("hailuo ai")
Pika (Pika Labs)299 impressions ("pika ai")
Wan (Alibaba)125 impressions ("wan ai") + 123 ("wan 2.2")

Real per-clip pricing, cheapest common tier

Transcribed directly from each vendor's published API rates, normalized to a representative ~5-second clip. Full rate cards are linked per model.

Kling 2.5 Turbo / 2.6 (no audio, 720p)$0.21 per ~5s clip (per-second). Cheapest current-generation Kling tier. Kling 3.0 no-audio 720p is $0.084/s ($0.42 per 5s) if you need the newest model.
Veo 3 (fast tier, 720p)$0.50 per ~5s clip (per-second). Audio included in the rate. Lite tier goes lower still (~$0.05–0.08/s); standard tier is ~$0.40/s.
Hailuo AI (fast tier, 768p, 6s)$0.19 per ~5s clip (per-generation). Priced per finished clip, not per second — figure shown is the actual 6-second clip price (closest to a 5s comparison point), not extrapolated.
Seedance (fast tier)$0.50 per ~5s clip (per-second). Standard tier costs more and raises the resolution ceiling to 4K; mini tier runs roughly half the standard price for high-volume work.

Why cross-vendor pricing comparison is harder than it looks

MiniMax prices Hailuo per finished generation rather than per second, so its "$0.19" figure is the actual price of a 6-second clip, not extrapolated math the way the per-second vendors' figures are. Comparing it directly to a per-second rate without noting that difference would overstate how directly comparable these numbers are.

The practical takeaway: pick the billing model that matches how you actually generate (many short variations vs. one long take), not just the lowest headline number.

Questions fréquentes

Where does this data come from?
Search-demand figures come from our own Bing Webmaster Tools account, pulled directly rather than sourced from a third-party report. Pricing figures are transcribed from each vendor's own published API documentation, not from resellers or aggregators.
Why use Bing data instead of Google?
Google doesn't expose raw search-volume data outside paid ad tools. Bing Webmaster Tools provides free, direct impression data for a site's own tracked queries, which we use as a relative demand proxy — useful for ranking models against each other even though it isn't Google's absolute volume.
How often is this report updated?
We update it as our underlying datasets change — new search-demand pulls or vendor pricing changes — rather than on a fixed schedule. Check the last-updated date above.
Voir le comparatif de prix interactif complet

Recevez les nouveaux guides par email

Un email quand nous publions de nouveaux guides et analyses de modèles. Pas de spam, désinscription à tout moment.